Between Symbol and Language-in-use
نویسنده
چکیده
Indexing is often designed with the intent of dimensional reduction, that is, of generating standardised and uniform descriptive metadata. This could be characterised as a process of decontextualisation. Formal knowledge representation systems typically have the aim of encapsulating granular pieces of information in a reusable manner. The result is a set of information elements with minimal links to external information sources. Plain-text tags, by comparison, have the aim of describing an object, within or outside a reductively described context. The result is a set of views that are contextualised to author, time, location, task or community. This paper discusses the relationship between symbol, contextual relation and language-in-use.
منابع مشابه
سمبولیسم نور و رنگ در عرفان ایرانی- اسلامی
Certainly, Gnosis and sufism- for its ethical values – is of the richest schools which play the most important role in communication of religion implicit message. The scope of the impacts and influence by mystical thoughts in Islamic community is to the extend that nobody can ignore it. As the words can not express mystics intuitional concepts ( abstract concepts) and as Rumi says" The words ...
متن کاملComparative Study of Symbol: Iranian Contemporary Architecture and Seljuk (Case Study:Tombes)
This article is about the comparative study of symbol in architecture and contemporary Seljuk tombs in Iran. Art is one of the arts associated with various sciences and science concepts, and various features of footprints can be seen. The signs and symbols of architectural buildings and monuments can be helpful. especially for the beauty of motifs and composition, and roles and indications sugg...
متن کاملRelationship Between Iranian University EFL Students’ Language Learning Aptitude and Language Learning Strategy Use
This study investigated the relationship between language learning aptitude (LLA) and the use of language learning strategies (LLSs) among a cohort of Iranian EFL students at Urmia University, Iran. The adapted versions of the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT; Carrol & Sapon, 1983) and Oxford’s (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) were distributed among the participants (i....
متن کاملRelationship Between Iranian L2 Learners’ Multiple Intelligences and Language Learning Strategies
L2 learners’ multiple intelligences (MI) profile plays a central role in theirperformance on different aspects of language learning, one of which is the use oflanguage learning strategies (LLSs). Gaining insights into the relationship betweenMI and LLSs makes L2 teachers better understand their learners’ strengths andweaknesses in the use of such strategies and lets them guide the learners bett...
متن کاملFirst Language Use in English Language Institutes: Are Teachers Free to Alternate between L1 and L2 as Means of Instruction?
Once severely rejected, first language (L1) use is no more considered to be inherently detrimental in foreign language pedagogy. Recent research within sociocultural framework has come up with numerous facilitative roles for L1 use (Anton and DiCamilla, 1999; Swain and Lapkin, 2000; Storch and Wigglesworth, 2003). Also, studies from humanistic perspectives that deal with the teachers’ and learn...
متن کاملThe Relationship between EFL Learners’ Use of Language Learning Strategies and Self-Perceived Language Proficiency
The present study was conducted to investigate whether there was a relationship between EFL learners’ use of language learning strategies and their self-perceived language proficiency at the two levels of intermediate and advanced. A total of 67 subjects (39 intermediate-level and 28 advanced) were selected to participate in this study based on their scores on a piloted language proficiency tes...
متن کامل